9.4 C
Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Amy Coney Barrett: Her religious beliefs are irrelevant to being on the Supreme Court

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett fielded an hours-long line of questioning from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday all without taking a single note. The judge speaks plainly and makes the confirmation process look effortless in much the same way she makes juggling a federal judgeship and family life look easy.  

“There is a tendency in our profession to treat the law as all-consuming, while losing sight of everything else. But that makes for a shallow and unfulfilling life,” she said. “I worked hard as a lawyer; I owed that to my clients, my students, and myself. But I never let the law define my identity or crowd out the rest of my life.” 

Judge Barrett has built a full life for herself, surrounded by her loving husband, Jesse, and their seven children. She’s a pre-eminent legal scholar and a woman of faith whose strength of character should be commended, not derided, by Senate Democrats. 

Her faith, however, has been a sticking point for some lawmakers over the years, as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, tried to apply an unconstitutional religious litmus test to the nominee during her Court of Appeals confirmation hearing in 2017. 

“The dogma lives loudly within you,” Ms. Feinstein said at the time, apparently commenting on the nominee’s religious background. Faith, however, is certainly not a characteristic that makes one ineligible as a public servant. 

Judge Barrett’s faith is not disqualifying now, and it was not disqualifying in 2017 when the Senate confirmed her by a healthy margin to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit — despite Ms. Feinstein’s religious hostility toward the now-appellate judge.  

As Sen. Chuck Grassley said this morning ahead of Judge Barrett’s opening statement, there is no place for a religious test in our system of government. “Article VI of the Constitution clearly prohibits religious tests for serving in public office,” he said.   

“Attacks on Judge Barrett’s faith disrespect and disrespect the Constitution and demean the confirmation process.” The Constitution explicitly prohibits lawmakers from requiring a nominee to swear allegiance to a specific faith or to renounce their own faith.  

The topic is to be avoided altogether, as lawmakers are to review a candidate based on his or her qualifications for the job in question. “[N]o religious Test shall ever be required as a qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States,” reads Article VI.

Sen. John Cornyn,Texas Republican, during opening statements Monday, reiterated this truth: “As you know, judge,” he said, addressing the nominee, “[T]here’s no religious test to serve on the Supreme Court. Why? Because the Constitution says so.” 

Judge Barrett repeatedly has said she will administer justice “without respect to persons,” as her oath requires, and interpret provisions of the Constitution according to their original public meaning, a judicial approach shared by the late Justice Antonin Scalia. 

Her approach to the law is simple. As Judge Barrett said during a lecture in 2018, “The text of the Constitution controls, so, the meaning of the words at the time they were ratified is the same as their meaning today.” 

It is her judicial philosophy, as well as her sterling legal credentials, that should be up for discussion during the remainder of her confirmation hearings — not her religious affiliation or her religious persuasions.  

As Sen. Ted Cruz said Monday during opening statements, the American people need a “direct check” on an out-of-control legislature. Traditionally, that check has been the Supreme Court. That has not been the case, however, as justices increasingly behave like super-legislators, creating law instead of interpreting it. 

If Judge Barrett is confirmed to serve on the bench, as she deserves, Americans will be protected from those who would like to see the courts bend the law to certain ideological preferences and the unwelcome religious bigotry that has crept its way into our political culture.

• Chris Carr is the 54th attorney general of Georgia and is a member of the Republican Attorneys General Association.


Latest news

Uber Sued For Firing Minority Drivers Who Get Poor Service Ratings From Customers

The latest chapter in the ridesharing soap opera that continues to play out across the U.S. (and notably California, where a court just ruled...

AOC says she doesn’t know if political future will be in House

New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was reticent when asked about her political ambitions. ...

Trump Goes on Defense After NY Times Reports He Had Over $280 Million in Debt Forgiven

President Donald Trump is going on defense following a report by The New York Times that claims the president had over $270 million in...

Related news

Unlike Biden and CNN, plurality of the public finds Hunter’s dealings corrupt. The people are right

“My son did nothing wrong,” Joe Biden has proudly declared when asked about Hunter’s...

Senate can act to end mistreatment of pregnant inmates

As she writhed on the filthy prison floor in isolation, screaming for her own...

Why these Obama-Trump voters are sticking with Trump in 2020

Millions of people voted for Barack Obama in 2008 or 2012, or both, and...

Where Is Hunter Biden’s Money?

Since the New York Post’s revelations that communication on Hunter Biden’s reported laptop detailed attempts to secure compensation from Ukrainian and Chinese energy firms,...

Trump Is Doing Better In Michigan And Wisconsin Than Polls Suggest

There’s something afoot in Michigan and Wisconsin. If you believe the polls, former Vice President Joe Biden is set to win both these states...

There’s No Going Back To ‘Normal.’ The GOP Is Changed Forever

Donald Trump is not a Republican. He never was before, and he is not one now. As the nation speeds toward Nov. 3, members...

Democrats Worked Hard To Put Barrett On The Supreme Court

Judge Amy Coney Barrett is now Justice Amy Coney Barrett, replacing the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. For invoking the...

Trending News

White House Blocks CDC ‘No Sail’ Order

The Centers for Disease...

DHS pushes back on reports lawyers can’t find parents of children separated at border

A Department of Homeland Security spokesman pushed back against a news story claiming that...

Secret Service Travel Logs Match Details in Alleged Hunter Biden Emails

Secret Service logs obtained earlier this year by Senate investigators include dates and locations matching those discussed in the emails allegedly belonging to Hunter...

Rasmussen poll says 46% of black voters approve of President Trump

A daily tracking poll of President Donald Trump's job approval released Friday showed an eye-popping surge in approval for Trump among black voters. According...

Joe Biden Boasts Of ‘Most Extensive’ Voter Fraud ‘In The History Of American Politics’

Democratic Presidential Nominee Joe Biden recently bragged that Democrats have created the “most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American...

Joe Biden was the “Big Guy” Getting 10% of the Deal With Chinese Businessman Says Insider

  Among the second set of documents released by the New York Post last week were emails involving two different business schemes Hunter Biden is...

Cycle Threshold Value Missing in CCP Virus Case Numbers: Experts

News Analysis Since the beginning of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic, policymakers in the United States have relied heavily on the daily positive cases—confirmed by...

Former never-Trumper James Lindsay on why he just CAN’T vote for Joe Biden

This is a moment "Cynical Theories" author James Lindsay probably hoped would never come. The liberal mathematician and host of the "New Discourses Podcast"...